Peter Yarrow (of Peter, Paul and Mary fame), dead at 86

Source: rollingstone.com 1/7/25
[ACSOL is showing how his sex crime is highlighted first]

Peter Yarrow, a major figure of the Sixties folk revival with Peter, Paul and Mary who was convicted of molesting a 14-year-old girl and later received a presidential pardon, died today, The New York Times reports. He was 86.

Read the full obituary

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Should I be appalled at their highlighting his offense or the fact that he got pardoned for something that goes far beyond what anyone commenting on this site has ever done. Yet there are those that have suffered for over 30 yrs for much less.

Disappointing that so much of the article is dedicated to his conviction, and other accusations, all from decades ago. I have no idea what this man did or did not do in his hotel rooms back in the ’60’s, but can we not set that aside for one day, and just mourn the loss of a wonderful and much beloved musician. He may have brought great sorrow to some, and my heart does go out to them, but this man definitely brought joy to millions, and I am one of them.

It’s 1977, I’m in Kindergarten, and we’re all gathered around our teacher as she plays her guitar, singing Puff the magic dragon. There are huge sections, whole years, of my childhood I can’t recall, but that I will never forget. I still smile every time I think of that moment, I just wish it could have been brought to mind under different circumstances.

We are all known forever even after we die mostly for one bad decision.

Sadly, in today’s world if they didn’t mention it they’d risk being cancelled. I’m not defending their editorial choices here, but rather pointing out that the problem is much bigger than what the editors of Rolling Stone decide to include in a story and its headline.

This former great music rag didn’t need to stoop this low and bring this to the forefront again as this passing is noted. There is absolutely no reason for this and the author of the article should be ashamed as well as the magazine as well as the owner of this magazine. Heck, I didn’t even know about it nor do I care.

This trio was a lot to a lot of people the time of its popularity and getting the country through some turbulent times. May he rest in peace and his family have fun positive memories of him. I love their music regardless of what this magazine thinks needs to be published.

His passing was also reported on Brietbart with not a single mention of his sexual misgivings. I believe those that follow the RAINN standards are the ones pushing this agenda.

This is just the media’s predictable way of getting it’s “parting shot” in for clicks, views and outrage bait. It’s disgusting how society wants to make sure your contributions and achievements are overshadowed and forever tainted at your epitaph if you’ve engaged into any sexual improprieties .

Rolling Stone even implies or suggests that the readers should be outraged that he received a pardon.

Just goes to show, even with a pardon and death, there is no escape from the court of public opinion.

I call it “final shaming.”

Last edited 4 hours ago by FactsShouldMatter